Wikipedia Bias


Wikipedia is a highly biased, left-wing online encyclopedia. Wikipedia's co-founder says that the online encyclopedia abandoned neutrality in favor of left-wing politics.


Wikipedia's description of Barack Obama conveniently omits his scandals: Benghazi, the IRS / Lois Lerner scandal, the AP phone records scandal, Fast and Furious, Solyndra, the Hillary Clinton email server scandal, and Obamagate.


Wikipedia is known for selectively labeling conservative or middle of the road media personalities, news outlets and groups, as "far-right" or "conspiracy theorists" while NOT giving any such opinion labels to left-wing outlets, groups and people. For example, the site describes outlets such as FOX News, the Washington Examiner, Townhall and others as "conservative" but gives NO opinion labels for CNN, MSNBC, NY Times, Washington Post, etc.


Wikipedia has a long-winded attack on Breitbart, saying "Its journalists are widely considered to be ideologically driven, and some of its content has been called misogynistic, xenophobic, and racist by liberals and many traditional conservatives alike. The site has published a number of conspiracy theories and intentionally misleading stories." Wikipedia conveniently uses other left-wing sources such as the NY Times and LA Times to make these attacks on Breitbart. Yet Wikipedia merely has this to say about the rabid left-wing site HuffPost: "It has been described as mostly liberal-leaning." Why on earth didn't Wikipedia describe HuffPost as ideologically driven and misleading? MediaBiasFactCheck cites the HuffPost as having "failed fact checks and the promotion of pseudoscience". But Wikipedia sees and hears no left-wing bias.


Wikipedia describes (OAN) as "a far-right, pro-Donald Trump cable channel". Whereas, Wikipedia describes the radical left-wing network MSNBC is "an American news-based pay television cable channel".


Wikipedia describes the Proud Boys as "far-right" and "neo-fascists", while falsely describing the far-left fascist group ANTIFA as "anti-fascist" and as merely "left-wing". Wikipedia also describes the Proud Boys only as a group that "promotes and engages in political violence", while tempering their description of ANTIFA as a group that uses "nonviolent and violent direct action".


Wikipedia outrageously smears conservative YouTuber Paul Joseph Watson as "a British right-wing YouTuber, radio host, writer and conspiracy theorist whose views have often been qualified as anti-feminist and politically extremist". They did this by citing far-left outlets Vice, the Guardian, the Washington Post, and merely by the fact that Watson is the UK editor of InfoWars. Vice, The Guardian, and the Washington Post's justification for labeling Watson as a "conspiracy theorist" was Watson merely questioning Hilary Clinton's health, which was a legitimate question during the final stages of her 2016 campaign.


Wikipedia's global warming page is a one-sided presentation of cherry picked information that attempts to reinforce the theory that humans are causing the planet to warm. Some of the most basic arguments against anthropogenic global warming are conveniently omitted (such as evidence of data tampering, urban heat island effect, margins of error in determining temperature, Tim Ball's climate reconstruction, climategate, correlation between sun spots and temperature, studies such as those by J. Kauppinen and P. Malmi, Klaus-Martin Schulte, Dennis Bray and Hans von Storch, Verhaggen, etc).


Wikipedia bans Christians from contributing to the site.


For a real encyclopedia, use


Go back to Liberal Companies you should boycott.